Predictika · diagnostics reagent-rental quotes: modules, capacity, commitment and billing

An AI sales agent's reagent-rental quote, checked before it goes out

An AI sales agent prepares a five-year reagent-rental quote for a fictional laboratory, with the annual billing it expects. Before the quote goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika’s validator, which checks it against module, capacity, commitment and discount rules, compares the annual billing the agent states with the one it computes, and returns a verdict with every reason.

Scope: Alinity c, i and h-series analyzers with AlinIQ AMS under reagent rental with a minimum annual commitment. See everything this validator covers

This validator configures and prices Alinity c, Alinity i and Alinity h-series analyzers with AlinIQ AMS under reagent-rental commitments. It handles any lab deal built from those modules and commitment terms, not just the scenarios shown below.

  • Configuration — Alinity c, Alinity i and Alinity h-series module counts, throughput against daily test volumes, the troponin menu rule, and AlinIQ AMS middleware.
  • Lab type and terms — Hospital, reference lab and physician-office limits, contract term, and reagent discount ceilings with rep authority.
  • Reagent-rental commitment — The minimum annual commitment as a share of placed equipment, projected reagent use, overcommitment approval, annual billing and contract total, and a check that the annual billing the agent states matches the validator figure.

It does not cover other diagnostic platforms, real prices, rates or contracts, or any real customer.

The AI sales agentBuilds the quote from the conversation and says it is ready.
Predictika validatorChecks the quote against the product and contract rules and returns every finding it has.

8 scenarios in 4 groups · each group runs from the agent’s first attempt to the outcome · click one to switch

What the agent proposes

The AI sales agent says

Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.

Proposing agent: AI sales agent (scripted)

Before sending, the agent must call Recorded run

Predictika validator


      
Waiting for the call.

Where rules-based CPQ gets it wrong

Click to expand

Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ or Revenue Cloud) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.

What the validator catchesTypical rules-based CPQPredictika
Capacity against test volumeOnly with workarounds
Throughput per module, operating hours and the 70 percent planning factor must be combined for each module type; rules tend to check module counts but not the volume the lab actually runs.
Capacity is computed from the module row and checked against the stated daily volumes together with every other rule.
Module limits and prerequisitesOnly with care
The 4-module ci limit, the 2-module office limit, the AMS requirement at three modules and the troponin menu rule are each simple, but they interact with the customer type.
All limits are evaluated together on every call and each failure is returned with its reason.
A commitment bounded on both sidesOnly with workarounds
A floor from placed equipment and a ceiling from projected use, with billing at the greater of the commitment and the projection, is hard to express as separate price rules.
The floor, the projection and the billed amount are computed once and every check reads the same figures.
Approval stepsOnly with care
Discounts above rep authority and overcommitments need a person to sign off, and the release must stay blocked until they do.
Approval items are returned with the verdict and the release step is refused until the approval is recorded.
Line items that add up to the annual billingOnly with workarounds
Reagent lines at discounted rates, plus a shortfall line when the commitment exceeds use, are easy to get out of step with the billed total.
The same computed figures feed the line items and the total, so they reconcile exactly.
The billing the agent statesOnly with workarounds
Comparing a stated figure with a computed one means a separate rule per quote layout, and price rules rarely run on stated figures.
The stated annual billing is a field in the request and is checked against the computed billing.
Every problem returned in one answerOnly with workarounds
Rules tend to fire as the quote is saved, so a rep often fixes one error and meets the next.
All findings come back together, whatever order the choices arrived in.

What this validator catches

Click to expand

Every rule is checked on every call, in whatever order the choices arrive, and one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the quote; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.

RuleEffectWhat it checks
1blockA ci-series system holds at most 4 chemistry and immunoassay modules together
2blockEach module type must carry the daily test volume at 70 percent of its rated throughput over the hours it runs (chemistry, immunoassay, hematology)
3blockHigh-sensitivity troponin I needs at least one Alinity i module
4blockA physician office lab is limited to 2 modules
5blockThree or more modules require AlinIQ AMS middleware
6blockThe contract term must be 3 to 7 years
7block, approvalThe reagent discount is capped by customer type (hospital 10, reference lab 15, physician office 5 percent); above the 3 percent rep authority it needs approval
8blockThe annual commitment must be at least 30 percent of the placed equipment list price
9approvalA commitment above projected reagent use needs approval, because the customer pays the shortfall
10computedAnnual billing is the greater of the commitment and projected reagent use; the contract total is annual billing times the term
11computedReagent charges are test volume times the contract rate after discount, with any shortfall shown as its own line
12blockThe annual billing the agent states must match the validator figure within $1

Scenarios and results

Click to expand

The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.

1. Module limit: Five ci modules

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 3 Alinity c and 2 Alinity i modules plus AlinIQ AMS, for 15,000 chemistry and 2,000 immunoassay tests a day over 20 hours, with an annual commitment of $2,000,000. Annual billing $3,906,000.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • More modules than one ci-series system holds. 3 Alinity c plus 2 Alinity i modules exceed the 4-module ci-series system.

2. Module limit: Four ci modules

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 2 Alinity c and 2 Alinity i modules plus AlinIQ AMS, for 15,000 chemistry and 2,000 immunoassay tests a day over 20 hours, with an annual commitment of $2,000,000. Annual billing $3,906,000.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

3. Minimum commitment: Commitment of $200,000

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 2 Alinity c and 1 Alinity i module plus AlinIQ AMS, for 3,000 chemistry and 300 immunoassay tests a day over 16 hours, with an annual commitment of $200,000. Annual billing $680,400.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Commitment below the minimum for the placed equipment. Committed $200000 per year is below the $303000.0 minimum (30 percent of $1010000 placed equipment).

4. Minimum commitment: Commitment of $650,000

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 2 Alinity c and 1 Alinity i module plus AlinIQ AMS, for 3,000 chemistry and 300 immunoassay tests a day over 16 hours, with an annual commitment of $650,000. Annual billing $680,400.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

5. Discount authority: 12 percent discount

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 2 Alinity c and 1 Alinity i module plus AlinIQ AMS, for 10,000 chemistry and 1,000 immunoassay tests a day over 16 hours, with an annual commitment of $1,900,000 and a 12 percent reagent discount. Annual billing $1,995,840.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Needs approval.

  • Discount above rep authority needs approval. 12 percent reagent discount is above the 3 percent rep authority; approvable up to 15 percent.

6. Discount authority: 3 percent discount

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 2 Alinity c and 1 Alinity i module plus AlinIQ AMS, for 10,000 chemistry and 1,000 immunoassay tests a day over 16 hours, with an annual commitment of $1,900,000 and a 3 percent reagent discount. Annual billing $2,199,960.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

7. The billing the agent states: Stated billing too low

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 2 Alinity c, 1 Alinity i and 1 Alinity h-series module plus AlinIQ AMS, for 8,000 chemistry, 800 immunoassay and 600 hematology tests a day over 16 hours, with high-sensitivity troponin I and an annual commitment of $1,500,000. Annual billing $1,762,560.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Stated annual billing differs from the validator figure. Stated annual billing does not match: the agent stated $1762560.0 a year; the validator computes $2073600.0 a year.

8. The billing the agent states: Stated billing corrected

The agent's request. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 2 Alinity c, 1 Alinity i and 1 Alinity h-series module plus AlinIQ AMS, for 8,000 chemistry, 800 immunoassay and 600 hematology tests a day over 16 hours, with high-sensitivity troponin I and an annual commitment of $1,500,000. Annual billing $2,073,600.00. Ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

Narration transcript

Click to expand

The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.

  1. Welcome to a demo of Predictika's Validator. An AI sales agent prepares a five-year reagent-rental quote for a fictional laboratory, with the annual billing it expects. Before the quote goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika’s validator, which checks it against module, capacity, commitment and discount rules, compares the annual billing the agent states with the one it computes, and returns a verdict with every reason.
  2. I will start with the first request by the agent.
  3. The agent says. A 5-year reagent-rental quote with 3 Alinity c and 2 Alinity i modules plus AlinIQ AMS, for 15,000 chemistry and 2,000 immunoassay tests a day over 20 hours. Annual billing $3,906,000.00. The rest of the request is on screen.
  4. Before it goes out, the agent calls the validator.
  5. Blocked, with one finding, all in one answer. 3 alinity c plus 2 alinity i modules exceed the 4-module ci-series system.
  6. The validator returned one blocking finding in one answer. A check that reads one field at a time would pass most of this; it shows only when the choices in the quote are checked against each other.
  7. What this shows: for module limits and prerequisites, a rules-based CPQ is error-prone for this.
  8. Now the agent resubmits.
  9. The corrected request. It changes the C Modules to 2.
  10. It calls the validator again.
  11. This time the validator clears it.
  12. The validator also returns the line-item quote, on screen.
  13. The earlier finding is cleared, and the validator's total, $3,906,000.00, matches the quote.
  14. One problem caught in one call, fixed in one pass, and a clean quote. That is the value of Predictika's validator: catching mistakes before they reach the customer.