Predictika · Semiconductor deposition tool quotes

An AI sales agent's PVD tool quote, checked before it goes out

An AI sales agent prepares a quote for a fictional fab: an Endura-class PVD cluster tool with a mainframe, process chambers, preclean and degas chambers, cryo pumps, an AGS service agreement and consumable targets. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika’s validator, which checks the configuration, the facility, the shipping destination and the contract terms, compares the net total the agent states with its own, and returns a verdict with every reason.

Scope: Endura-class PVD cluster tool quotes: mainframe, process chambers, preclean and degas, facility power, export-restricted destinations, service agreement and discount. See everything this validator covers

This validator models 2 mainframes and 5 process chambers (TaN barrier, Cu seed, Ti TiN liner, Co liner and Al PVD) with preclean, degas and cryo pumps, built from public product information about the Endura platform. It handles any quote built from them, not just the scenarios shown below.

  • Mainframes and chambers — Process and pass-through facet capacity, preclean and degas needs, process order, and throughput against the wafers per hour required.
  • Facilities and shipping — Facility power the tool needs against what the fab supplies, export-restricted destinations, and lead time against the weeks the fab needs.
  • Service and pricing — Service tier term and uptime commitment, rep discount limits and approvals, the line-item price build-up, and the net total the agent states.

It does not cover other process platforms or non-PVD modules, and it does not use real prices or availability. Every price, limit and power figure is an illustrative estimate.

The AI sales agentBuilds the quote from the conversation and says it is ready.
Predictika validatorChecks the quote against the product and contract rules and returns every finding it has.

9 scenarios in workflow pairs · click one to switch

What the agent says

Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.

Before sending, the agent must call

Predictika validator Recorded run


      
Waiting for the call.

Where rules-based CPQ gets it wrong

Click to expand

Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ or Revenue Cloud) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.

What the validator catchesTypical rules-based CPQPredictika
Facets and chamber capacityOnly with care
Each mainframe has its own process and pass-through facet limits, and preclean and degas chambers compete for the pass-through facets. This usually becomes one hand-written validation rule per mainframe.
The limits are catalog data; one rule compares the chamber counts with them for any mainframe.
Process order and prerequisitesOnly with care
Cu seed after a TaN barrier, and a preclean chamber for barrier, seed and liner chambers, depend on which chamber sits in which step, so they tend to be separate conditional rules.
All of them are evaluated together, and every one that applies is named.
Export-restricted destinationsOnly with workarounds
One destination field has two outcomes: advanced-node chambers are blocked outright, and any restricted destination also needs a license review. Rules-based CPQ commonly handles this with approval chains plus custom checks.
The same request returns the block and the approval in one answer, blocks first.
Facility power against the chambersOnly with care
The power the tool needs is a sum over the chosen parts, compared with a figure from the customer; that needs a calculated field first.
The sum is derived on each call and compared with the fab supply when it is stated.
The net total the agent statesOnly with workarounds
Comparing a stated figure with a computed one needs a separate rule, and price rules rarely run on stated figures.
The stated net total is a field in the request and is checked against the computed net total.
Every problem returned in one answerOnly with workarounds
Rules tend to fire as the quote is built, so a problem raised late can hide an earlier one.
Every rule is evaluated at the end of input and all findings come back together.

What this validator catches

Click to expand

Every rule is checked on every call, in whatever order the choices arrive, and one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the quote; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.

RuleEffectWhat it checks
1blockFirst-step chamber: at least one process chamber is required
2blockMainframe capacity: process chambers may not exceed the process facets (5 on the standard mainframe, 7 on the extended)
3blockPass-through facets: preclean plus degas chambers may not exceed the pass-through facets (2 standard, 3 extended)
4blockPreclean: barrier, seed and liner chambers need a preclean chamber on the tool
5blockDegas: every tool needs at least one degas chamber
6blockProcess order: Cu seed must follow a TaN barrier step
7blockThroughput: the slower process step (chambers times wafers per hour each) must meet the wafers per hour required
8blockFacility power: when the fab states its supply, the power the tool needs must not exceed it
9blockExport: advanced-node chambers cannot ship to an export-restricted destination
10approvalExport: any export-restricted destination needs a trade-compliance license review
11blockService term: Performance service needs a term of at least 3 years
12blockService uptime: requested uptime may not exceed the tier commitment (90 Basic, 95 Uptime, 97 Performance)
13blockLead time: the longest lead time of the mainframe and chambers must fit the weeks the fab needs
14block, approvalDiscount: above 12 percent blocks; above 5 percent needs manager approval
15computedPricing: tool list from mainframe, chambers, preclean, degas and one cryo pump per process chamber; AGS as a percent of tool list per year; consumable targets from monthly wafers; installation
16blockThe net total the agent states must match the validator net total within $1

Scenarios and results

Click to expand

The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.

1. Full cluster tool order: Six chambers, standard mainframe

The agent's request. Quote for Corvane Semiconductor: one Endura 2 standard mainframe with three Ti TiN liner chambers and three Encore Cu seed chambers, one degas chamber and six cryo pumps. Performance of 110 wafers per hour or better, AGS Performance service for 2 years, 13 percent discount, delivery within 32 weeks, fab supply 240 kVA. Net total $26,846,400. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • More process chambers than the mainframe has facets. 6 process chambers exceed the 5 process facets on the Endura 2 mainframe standard.
  • Preclean chamber required for these process chambers. The selected barrier, seed or liner chambers require a preclean chamber on the tool.
  • Cu seed must follow a TaN barrier step. Cu seed must follow a TaN barrier step; the first step is Ti TiN liner.
  • Performance service needs a term of at least 3 years. AGS Performance agreements require a term of at least 3 years.
  • Discount above the maximum. 13 percent discount exceeds the 12 percent maximum.
  • Stated net total differs from the validator total. The net total the agent states ($26,846,400) differs from the net total the validator computes ($24,375,100).

2. Full cluster tool order: Extended mainframe, TaN first

The agent's request. Quote for Corvane Semiconductor: one Endura 2 extended mainframe with three Encore TaN barrier chambers and three Encore Cu seed chambers, one preclean chamber, one degas chamber and six cryo pumps. Performance of 110 wafers per hour or better, AGS Performance service for 3 years, 8 percent discount, delivery within 32 weeks, fab supply 240 kVA. Net total $36,232,800. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Facility power below what the tool needs. The tool needs 254 kVA of facility power but the fab supplies 240 kVA.
  • Lead time longer than the fab can wait. Longest lead time is 36 weeks; the fab needs the tool in 32.
  • Discount needs manager approval. 8 percent discount is above the 5 percent rep authority.

3. Full cluster tool order: Power and delivery date corrected

The agent's request. Quote for Corvane Semiconductor: one Endura 2 extended mainframe with three Encore TaN barrier chambers and three Encore Cu seed chambers, one preclean chamber, one degas chamber and six cryo pumps. Performance of 110 wafers per hour or better, AGS Performance service for 3 years, 5 percent discount, delivery within 38 weeks, fab supply 260 kVA. Net total $36,917,100. Ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

4. Export-restricted destination: Co liner tool, restricted destination

The agent's request. Quote for Harborview Microdevices: one Endura 2 extended mainframe with three Encore TaN barrier chambers and two Co liner chambers, one preclean chamber, one degas chamber and five cryo pumps. Performance of 60 wafers per hour or better, AGS Uptime service for 3 years, no discount. Net total $36,345,750. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Advanced-node chamber cannot ship to a restricted destination. Advanced-node chambers cannot be shipped to an export-restricted destination.
  • Export license review needed. Destination is export-restricted; trade-compliance license review required.

5. Export-restricted destination: Ti TiN liner instead, same destination

The agent's request. Quote for Harborview Microdevices: one Endura 2 extended mainframe with three Encore TaN barrier chambers and two Ti TiN liner chambers, one preclean chamber, one degas chamber and five cryo pumps. Performance of 60 wafers per hour or better, AGS Uptime service for 3 years, no discount. Net total $29,247,750. Ready to send.

Verdict: Needs approval.

  • Export license review needed. Destination is export-restricted; trade-compliance license review required.

6. Service agreement: Performance service, 2 years, 98 percent

The agent's request. Quote for Alder Creek Semiconductor: one Endura 2 standard mainframe with two Encore TaN barrier chambers and two Encore Cu seed chambers, one preclean chamber, one degas chamber and four cryo pumps. Performance of 70 wafers per hour or better, AGS Performance service for 2 years at 98 percent uptime, 5 percent discount. Net total $23,980,600. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Performance service needs a term of at least 3 years. AGS Performance agreements require a term of at least 3 years.
  • Uptime above what the service tier commits. 98 percent uptime requested but Performance agreements commit to 97 percent.

7. Service agreement: Performance service, 3 years, 97 percent

The agent's request. Quote for Alder Creek Semiconductor: one Endura 2 standard mainframe with two Encore TaN barrier chambers and two Encore Cu seed chambers, one preclean chamber, one degas chamber and four cryo pumps. Performance of 70 wafers per hour or better, AGS Performance service for 3 years at 97 percent uptime, 5 percent discount. Net total $28,179,400. Ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

8. Stated total: Stated total ignores the discount

The agent's request. Quote for Silverline Devices: one Endura 2 extended mainframe with three Ti TiN liner chambers and three Al PVD chambers, one preclean chamber, two degas chambers and six cryo pumps. Performance of 120 wafers per hour or better, AGS Uptime service for 3 years, 5 percent discount. Net total $29,527,700. Ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Stated net total differs from the validator total. The net total the agent states ($29,527,700) differs from the net total the validator computes ($28,552,200).

9. Stated total: Stated total corrected

The agent's request. Quote for Silverline Devices: one Endura 2 extended mainframe with three Ti TiN liner chambers and three Al PVD chambers, one preclean chamber, two degas chambers and six cryo pumps. Performance of 120 wafers per hour or better, AGS Uptime service for 3 years, 5 percent discount. Net total $28,552,200. Ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

Narration transcript

Click to expand

The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.

  1. Welcome to a demo of Predictika's Validator. An AI sales agent prepares a quote for a fictional fab: an Endura-class PVD cluster tool with a mainframe, process chambers, preclean and degas chambers, and more. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika’s validator, which checks the configuration, the facility, the shipping destination and the contract terms, compares the net total the agent states with its own, and returns a verdict with every reason.
  2. I will start with the first request by the agent.
  3. The agent says. Quote for Corvane Semiconductor: one Endura 2 standard mainframe with three Ti TiN liner chambers and three Encore Cu seed chambers, one degas chamber and six cryo pumps. Performance of 110 wafers per hour or better, AGS Performance service for 2 years, 13 percent discount, delivery within 32 weeks, fab supply 240 kVA. The rest of the request is on screen. Net total $26,846,400.
  4. Before it goes out, the agent calls the validator.
  5. Blocked, with six findings, all in one answer. 6 process chambers exceed the 5 process facets on the Endura 2 mainframe standard. The selected barrier, seed or liner chambers require a preclean chamber on the tool. Cu seed must follow a TaN barrier step; the first step is Ti TiN liner. The other three are on screen.
  6. The validator returned six blocking findings in one answer. A check that reads one field at a time would pass most of this; it shows only when the choices in the quote are checked against each other and against the stated total.
  7. What this shows: for facets and chamber capacity, a rules-based CPQ is error-prone for this.
  8. Now the agent resubmits.
  9. The corrected request. It changes the mainframe to Endura 2 mainframe extended, the first-step chamber to Encore TaN barrier, the preclean chambers to 1, the service term to 3 years, the discount requested to 8 percent and the stated net total to $36,232,800.
  10. It calls the validator again.
  11. Still blocked, with two findings and one approval, all in one answer. The tool needs 254 kVA of facility power but the fab supplies 240 kVA. Longest lead time is 36 weeks; the fab needs the tool in 32.
  12. Six findings cleared, but the change brings a different blocking finding: facility power below what the tool needs and lead time longer than the fab can wait.
  13. The agent resubmits once more.
  14. The revised request. It changes the delivery needed within to 38 weeks, the discount requested to 5 percent, the fab power supply to 260 kVA and the stated net total to $36,917,100.
  15. It calls the validator once more.
  16. This time the validator clears it.
  17. All three earlier findings are cleared, and the validator's total, $36,917,100.00, matches the quote.
  18. Six problems caught in one call, fixed in two passes, and a clean $36,917,100 quote. That is the value of Predictika's validator: catching mistakes before they reach the customer.