Predictika · ACA individual marketplace plans: enrollment windows, premium tax credit, cost-sharing reductions and age-rated premiums
An AI sales agent prepares an individual marketplace plan quote for a fictional applicant. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika’s validator, which checks it against the enrollment, tax credit, cost-sharing and pricing rules, compares the monthly premium the agent states with the one it computes, and returns a verdict with every reason.
This validator models individual marketplace quotes in the style of Centene Ambetter plans: enrollment eligibility, premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction rules, and age-rated pricing for the 2026 plan year. It handles any quote made of these plans and rules, not just the scenarios shown below.
It does not cover other carriers or products, real rates and benchmark premiums, small-group or Medicare plans, or state-specific rules beyond the five rating areas modeled.
8 scenarios in 4 groups · each group runs from the agent’s first attempt to the outcome · click one to switch
Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.
Proposing agent: AI sales agent (scripted)
Before sending, the agent must call Recorded run
What this means
Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ or Revenue Cloud) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.
| What the validator catches | Typical rules-based CPQ | Predictika |
|---|---|---|
| Tax credit eligibility | Only with workarounds Income band, Medicaid expansion, employer offer and plan level interlock, so a rules-based CPQ needs separate rules for each combination. | All of them are evaluated together on every call. |
| A credit based on another plan | Only with workarounds The credit depends on the benchmark silver plan in the area, not the plan sold, which a price rule has to look up separately. | The benchmark premium is part of the same calculation. |
| Cost-sharing variant by income band | Only with care The variant must match the income band and exists only on silver plans, which usually becomes one rule per band. | The expected variant is computed from income and compared with the one chosen. |
| Enrollment window and metal lock | Only with workarounds The 60-day window and the metal-level lock depend on the event date and current coverage, which quote rules rarely see. | Both are checked from the dates and coverage in the request. |
| The premium the agent states | Only with workarounds Comparing a stated premium with a computed one means a separate rule per quote layout, and price rules rarely run on stated figures. | The stated premium is a field in the request and is checked against the computed premium. |
| Every problem returned in one answer | Only with workarounds Rules tend to fire as the application is saved, so a rep often fixes one error and meets the next. | All findings come back together, whatever order the choices arrived in. |
Every rule is checked on every call, in whatever order the choices arrive, and one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the quote; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.
| Rule | Effect | What it checks |
|---|---|---|
| Plan sold in the area | block | A plan is sold only in rating areas of its own state |
| Enrollment window | block | Outside open enrollment and without a qualifying life event there is no enrollment window |
| 60-day special enrollment window | block | A qualifying life event must be within the last 60 days |
| Metal-level lock | block | A current enrollee using a special enrollment period stays in the same metal level |
| Household size | block | The household must be at least as large as the people on the application |
| Catastrophic plan eligibility | block | Catastrophic plans are for applicants under 30 or with a hardship exemption |
| No credit on catastrophic plans | block | Advance premium tax credits cannot be applied to a catastrophic plan |
| Medicaid expansion states | block | Income under 138 percent of the poverty level in an expansion state goes to Medicaid, not the tax credit |
| Coverage gap | block | Income under 100 percent of the poverty level in a non-expansion state has no tax credit |
| 400 percent income cap | block | No premium tax credit above 400 percent of the poverty level |
| Affordable employer coverage | block | An affordable employer plan offer bars the tax credit |
| Cost-sharing reduction level | block | The cost-sharing variant must match the income band, and exists only on silver plans |
| Cost-sharing reductions given up | needs approval | A household that qualifies for the reductions must acknowledge giving them up on a non-silver plan |
| Special enrollment documents | needs approval | Special enrollment needs documents proving the qualifying event before coverage starts |
| Stated member premium | block | The monthly premium the agent states differs from the computed premium by more than USD 1 |
The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care 11 Silver for a single 40-year-old applicant in Dallas, household income $28,000, with the advance premium tax credit applied. Member premium USD 117.50 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care 11 Silver for a single 40-year-old applicant in Dallas, household income $28,000, with the advance premium tax credit and the 87 percent cost-sharing reduction variant. Member premium USD 117.50 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care 11 Silver for a Dallas family of four (two adults aged 35 and 33 and two children), household income $150,000. Member premium USD 1,619.50 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care 11 Silver for a Dallas family of four (two adults aged 35 and 33 and two children), household income $150,000, paying the full premium. Member premium USD 1,619.50 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care Silver NC for a Charlotte family of three (aged 34 and 32 and one child), household income $55,000, enrolling through a special enrollment period after a move, with the premium tax credit and the 73 percent cost-sharing reduction variant. Member premium USD 408.12 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care Silver NC for a Charlotte family of three (aged 34 and 32 and one child), household income $55,000, enrolling through a special enrollment period after a move 30 days ago, with the premium tax credit and the 73 percent cost-sharing reduction variant. Member premium USD 408.12 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Needs approval.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care Silver FL for a Miami couple aged 60 and 62, household income $60,000, with the advance premium tax credit applied. Member premium USD 486.23 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Ambetter Balanced Care Silver FL for a Miami couple aged 60 and 62, household income $60,000, with the advance premium tax credit applied. Member premium USD 540.26 per month. Ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.