Predictika · Security gateway orders
An AI sales agent prepares an order for a Check Point Quantum Force perimeter firewall: a model, a Base, Plus or Max configuration, the ports, memory, concurrent sessions and virtual systems it needs, the threat prevention and VPN throughput, and the rating it states for the model. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of the figures Check Point publishes in its appliance comparison chart and returns a verdict, every reason and the figures it computed.
This validator models orders for the Check Point Quantum Force 9100 to 9800 (1U perimeter firewalls), not just the scenarios shown below.
Any order for these six Quantum Force models that touches these rules is in scope — not only the scenarios pictured here. Not covered: prices (Check Point publishes no list prices for these appliances, so this validator produces no price build-up or line-item quote), the Quantum Force 19100 to 29200 data center models, the Quantum Spark and legacy gateways, Smart-1 management, software subscriptions and support, how many expansion cards fit in the network slots (the comparison chart and the datasheets describe the slots differently, so only the listed port counts are checked), the Maestro hyperscale ordering options, and licensing. Assumptions: the Base, Plus and Max port and memory counts are taken as the limits of each configuration; the Maestro approval is this model's way of passing a scale-out design to a person. The model reflects the comparison chart dated February 1, 2026 and the Force datasheets read in October 2026; later editions may differ.
7 scenarios in 3 groups · each group runs from the agent’s first attempt to the outcome · click one to switch
Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.
Proposing agent: AI sales agent (scripted)
Before sending, the agent must call Recorded run
What this means
Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.
| What the validator caught | Typical rules-based CPQ | Predictika |
|---|---|---|
| A port count that depends on the model and the configuration | Only with care Port counts differ for six models and three configurations, so a long table and a rule reading it have to be kept in step. | Model, configuration and port counts are in one request; the table is applied on every call. |
| A virtual-system limit that depends on model, configuration and software set | Only with workarounds The limit changes with three selections at once; a rules-based CPQ needs a lookup keyed to all three. | The three choices are checked together with the count requested. |
| HTTPS inspection throughput lower than the headline rating | Only with workarounds Two ratings per model, and the lower one applies only when inspection is on; extra formulas are needed. | The rule is applied whenever inspection is requested. |
| A stated rating that disagrees with the published value | Only with workarounds The published figure is derived from the model; checking a stated figure against it takes extra formulas. | The stated rating is a field in the request and is compared with the published value. |
| Every problem returned in one answer | Only with workarounds Rules tend to fire as the order is saved or a step is completed, so a rep often fixes one error and meets the next. | All findings come back together, whatever order the choices arrived in. |
Every rule is checked on every call, in any order the choices arrive; one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the quote; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.
| 1 | The quote has 12 1/10 GbE fiber ports; this model and configuration offer up to 4. |
| 2 | The quote asks for 32 GB of memory; this model and configuration have 16 GB. |
| 3 | The quote needs 7,000 thousand concurrent sessions; this model and configuration are listed for 2,750 thousand. |
| 4 | The quote has 10 virtual systems; with the selected software set this model and configuration support up to 9. |
| 5 | The quote has 4 10/25 GbE fiber ports; this model and configuration offer up to 0. |
| 6 | The quote has 2 40/100 GbE fiber ports; this model and configuration offer up to 0. |
| 7 | The quote has 8 on-board 1/10 GbE copper ports; this model has 6. |
| 8 | The quote needs 7,500 thousand concurrent sessions; this model and configuration are listed for 7,270 thousand. |
| 9 | The quote has 17 virtual systems; with the selected software set this model and configuration support up to 16. |
| 10 | The quote has 65 virtual systems; with the selected software set this model and configuration support up to 64. |
| 11 | Redundant storage is not listed for this model. |
| 12 | The quote needs 15,000 Mbps of threat prevention; this model is rated for 14,000 Mbps. |
| 13 | With HTTPS inspection the quote needs 8,000 Mbps of threat prevention; this model is rated for 5,500 Mbps with HTTPS inspection. |
| 14 | The quote needs 40,001 Mbps of VPN throughput; this model is rated for 40,000 Mbps. |
| 15 | The quote states 15,000 Mbps of threat prevention for this model, but the listed rating is 14,000 Mbps. |
| 16 | A Maestro scale-out system is requested; a person should confirm the orchestrator and gateway count, which this validator does not size. |
| 17 | The quote needs 170,000 Mbps of threat prevention; a Maestro system of this model scales up to 165,000 Mbps. |
| 18 | The quote asks for 128 GB of memory; this model and configuration have 64 GB. |
| 19 | The quote needs 29,000 thousand concurrent sessions; this model and configuration are listed for 15,000 thousand. |
| 20 | The quote has 8 1/10 GbE fiber ports; this model and configuration offer up to 0. |
| 21 | The quote has 12 virtual systems; with the selected software set this model and configuration support up to 9. |
| 22 | The quote needs 9,000 Mbps of threat prevention; this model is rated for 8,000 Mbps. |
| 23 | The quote needs 30,000 Mbps of VPN throughput; this model is rated for 28,600 Mbps. |
| 24 | The quote states 9,000 Mbps of threat prevention for this model, but the listed rating is 8,000 Mbps. |
The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.
The agent's request. Please prepare an order for a Check Point Quantum Force 9200 in the Plus configuration with 8 1/10 GbE fiber ports, 32 GB of memory, room for 7,000 thousand concurrent sessions and 30 virtual systems running next generation threat prevention. It must handle 7,000 Mbps of threat prevention and 25,000 Mbps of VPN throughput, and redundant storage. The order states a threat prevention rating of 8,000 Mbps for this model. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please prepare an order for a Check Point Quantum Force 9700 in the Plus configuration with 8 1/10 GbE fiber ports, 32 GB of memory, room for 7,000 thousand concurrent sessions and 30 virtual systems running next generation threat prevention. It must handle 7,000 Mbps of threat prevention and 25,000 Mbps of VPN throughput, and redundant storage. The order states a threat prevention rating of 20,000 Mbps for this model. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Please prepare an order for a Check Point Quantum Force 9400 in the Base configuration with 12 1/10 GbE fiber ports, 32 GB of memory, room for 2,750 thousand concurrent sessions and 8 virtual systems running next generation threat prevention. It must handle 12,000 Mbps of threat prevention and 30,000 Mbps of VPN throughput. The order states a threat prevention rating of 14,000 Mbps for this model. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please prepare an order for a Check Point Quantum Force 9400 in the Plus configuration with 12 1/10 GbE fiber ports, 32 GB of memory, room for 2,750 thousand concurrent sessions and 8 virtual systems running next generation threat prevention. It must handle 12,000 Mbps of threat prevention and 30,000 Mbps of VPN throughput. The order states a threat prevention rating of 14,000 Mbps for this model. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Please prepare an order for a Check Point Quantum Force 9300 in the Plus configuration with 8 1/10 GbE fiber ports, 32 GB of memory, room for 7,000 thousand concurrent sessions and 10 virtual systems running next generation threat prevention. It must handle 8,000 Mbps of threat prevention and 25,000 Mbps of VPN throughput, with HTTPS inspection turned on. The order states a threat prevention rating of 10,500 Mbps for this model. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please prepare an order for a Check Point Quantum Force 9700 in the Plus configuration with 8 1/10 GbE fiber ports, 32 GB of memory, room for 7,000 thousand concurrent sessions and 10 virtual systems running next generation threat prevention. It must handle 8,000 Mbps of threat prevention and 25,000 Mbps of VPN throughput, with HTTPS inspection turned on. The order states a threat prevention rating of 20,000 Mbps for this model. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Please prepare an order for a Check Point Quantum Force 9800 in the Plus configuration with 12 1/10 GbE fiber ports, 64 GB of memory, room for 15,000 thousand concurrent sessions and 30 virtual systems running next generation threat prevention. It must handle 120,000 Mbps of threat prevention and 50,000 Mbps of VPN throughput, as a Maestro scale-out system. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Needs approval.
The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.