Predictika · Water desalination equipment

An AI sales agent's desalination train quote, checked before it goes out

An AI sales agent specifies the energy recovery equipment for a reverse osmosis train: the pressure exchanger series and how many devices, the flow through each device, the pressure, the circulation pump and the figures the quote states for the series. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of the figures in the public Energy Recovery 2024 Water Products Catalog and returns a verdict, every reason and the figures it computed.

Scope: Energy Recovery PX Pressure Exchanger series (PX U, PX Q, PX Q400, PX L, PX PowerTrain) with the AquaBold, VPXP, HP and UHP circulation pumps: flow, pressure, pairing and stated figures. See everything this validator covers

This validator models the pressure exchanger and circulation pump figures in the public Energy Recovery 2024 Water Products Catalog, not just the scenarios shown below.

  • Pressure exchanger series — the flow range per device (PX U 10 to 250 gpm, PX Q 20 to 400, PX Q400 290 to 400, PX L 30 to 260, PX PowerTrain 800 to 3,000), the pressure rating (1,740, 1,200, 1,200, 400 and 1,200 psi) and the peak efficiency (95, 98, 98, 97 and 98 percent).
  • Flow and pressure — the flow through each device must fall within the series range, and the pressure within the series rating.
  • Circulation pumps — the pump flow range and pressure rating of the AquaBold (by frame size and number of stages), VPXP, HP and UHP pumps, the permeate range that suits the HP and VPXP pumps, and the catalog's pairing of the UHP pump with the PX U series (a different pairing goes to a person to confirm).
  • Stated figures — the peak efficiency and rated pressure the quote states for the series must equal the catalog figures.

Any train specification built from these series and pumps is in scope — not only the scenarios pictured here. Not covered: prices (Energy Recovery publishes none in the catalog, so this page shows no price build-up), the turbochargers, the newer PX Q650, the individual models inside a series (the catalog gives their flow ranges only as a chart), membrane and feed pump design, and the Power Model Pro configurator. The catalog describes the PX U series as the ultra-high-pressure RO solution and pairs the UHP pump with the PX U40; where a quote departs from those descriptions the validator asks a person to confirm rather than blocking. The catalog edition read is March 2024.

The AI sales agentSpecifies the train from the conversation and says it is ready.
Predictika validatorChecks every rule at once and returns the verdict, each finding, and the computed figures.

7 scenarios in 3 groups · each group runs from the agent’s first attempt to the outcome · click one to switch

What the agent proposes

The AI sales agent says

Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.

Proposing agent: AI sales agent (scripted)

Before sending, the agent must call Recorded run

Predictika validator


      
Waiting for the call.

Where rules-based CPQ gets it wrong

Click to expand

Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.

What the validator caughtTypical rules-based CPQPredictika
Flow range that depends on the seriesOnly with workarounds
Each series has its own flow range per device, so a rules-based CPQ needs a rule or lookup table per series.
The series selects its range inside one model and the flow is compared in the same pass.
Pump limits that differ by pump and frameOnly with workarounds
The AquaBold flow and stage limits depend on the frame, the HP and VPXP limits on the permeate rate; each is a separate rule set.
Each pump selects its limits inside one model, in any order of choices.
Pairing between pumps and pressure exchangersOnly with care
A rule can flag the UHP pump with a series other than PX U, but it has to be written and kept in step with the catalog.
The pairing is a named finding that comes back with the verdict.
Efficiency and pressure stated in the quoteOnly with care
The stated figures are derived from the series, so a rule has to recompute them and compare.
The stated figures are fields in the request, compared with the catalog figures on every call.
Every problem returned in one answerOnly with workarounds
Rules tend to fire as the quote is saved or a step is completed, so a person often fixes one error and meets the next.
All findings come back together, whatever order the choices arrived in.

What this validator catches: findings from its test cases

Click to expand

Every rule is checked on every call, in any order the choices arrive; one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the quote; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.

1The flow of 401 gpm through each device is outside the 20 to 400 gpm that this pressure exchanger series handles.
2The flow of 19 gpm through each device is outside the 20 to 400 gpm that this pressure exchanger series handles.
3The flow of 289 gpm through each device is outside the 290 to 400 gpm that this pressure exchanger series handles.
4The train operates at 401 psi; this pressure exchanger is rated up to 400 psi.
5The train operates at 1,201 psi; this pressure exchanger is rated up to 1,200 psi.
6The train operates at 1,201 psi; this pump is rated up to 1,200 psi.
7The train operates at 1,741 psi; this pressure exchanger is rated up to 1,740 psi.
8The train operates at 1,741 psi; this pump is rated up to 1,740 psi.
9The flow of 3,001 gpm through each device is outside the 800 to 3,000 gpm that this pressure exchanger series handles.
10The catalog describes the PX U series as the ultra-high-pressure RO solution; this ultra-high-pressure RO quote uses a different pressure exchanger, so a person should confirm it with Energy Recovery.
11The catalog describes the PX U series as the ultra-high-pressure RO solution; this application is not ultra-high-pressure RO, so a person should confirm the series with Energy Recovery.
12The catalog pairs the UHP circulation pump with the PX U40; this quote pairs it with a different pressure exchanger, so a person should confirm the pairing with Energy Recovery.
13The pump flow of 251 gpm is outside the 44 to 250 gpm of this pump.
14The train makes 1,001 cubic meters of permeate a day; this pump suits 0 to 1,000.
15The pump flow of 2,301 gpm is outside the 175 to 2,300 gpm of this pump.
16The pump flow of 174 gpm is outside the 175 to 2,300 gpm of this pump.
17The train makes 639 cubic meters of permeate a day; this pump suits 640 to 10,000.
18The train operates at 1,500 psi; this pump is rated up to 1,200 psi.
19The AquaBold pump is quoted without a frame size.
20The pump flow of 99 gpm is outside the 100 to 264 gpm of this pump.

Scenarios and results

Click to expand

The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.

1. A seawater train on a low-pressure device: Seawater train on PX L devices with an HP pump

The agent's request. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for a seawater reverse osmosis train: 2 PX L pressure exchanger devices with 200 gpm through each device at 1,000 psi, with an HP circulation pump at 200 gpm. The train makes 2,500 cubic meters of permeate a day. The quote states a peak efficiency of 97 percent for the series. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Pressure above the pressure exchanger rating. The train operates at 1,000 psi; this pressure exchanger is rated up to 400 psi.
  • Permeate rate outside the pump range. The train makes 2,500 cubic meters of permeate a day; this pump suits 0 to 1,000.

2. A seawater train on a low-pressure device: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for a seawater reverse osmosis train: 6 PX Q400 pressure exchanger devices with 320 gpm through each device at 1,000 psi, with a VPXP circulation pump at 300 gpm. The train makes 2,500 cubic meters of permeate a day. The quote states a peak efficiency of 98 percent for the series. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Train summary. Each device handles 290 to 400 gpm up to 1,200 psi at a peak efficiency of 98 percent; the train has 6 devices.

3. An ultra-high-pressure train: Ultra-high-pressure train on PX Q devices with a UHP pump

The agent's request. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for an ultra-high-pressure reverse osmosis train: 3 PX Q pressure exchanger devices with 150 gpm through each device at 1,500 psi, with a UHP circulation pump at 50 gpm. The train makes 150 cubic meters of permeate a day. The quote states a peak efficiency of 98 percent for the series. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Pressure above the pressure exchanger rating. The train operates at 1,500 psi; this pressure exchanger is rated up to 1,200 psi.
  • Ultra-high-pressure RO without the PX U series. The catalog describes the PX U series as the ultra-high-pressure RO solution; this ultra-high-pressure RO quote uses a different pressure exchanger, so a person should confirm it with Energy Recovery.
  • UHP pump without the PX U series. The catalog pairs the UHP circulation pump with the PX U40; this quote pairs it with a different pressure exchanger, so a person should confirm the pairing with Energy Recovery.

4. An ultra-high-pressure train: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for an ultra-high-pressure reverse osmosis train: 3 PX U pressure exchanger devices with 150 gpm through each device at 1,500 psi, with a UHP circulation pump at 50 gpm. The train makes 150 cubic meters of permeate a day. The quote states a peak efficiency of 95 percent for the series. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Train summary. Each device handles 10 to 250 gpm up to 1,740 psi at a peak efficiency of 95 percent; the train has 3 devices.

5. A large train with an AquaBold feed pump: Large seawater train with an AquaBold 3x4x7 pump and a stated efficiency of 99 percent

The agent's request. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for a seawater reverse osmosis train: 3 PX Q400 pressure exchanger devices with 300 gpm through each device at 1,100 psi, with an AquaBold circulation pump at 600 gpm (frame 3x4x7, 22 stages). The train makes 4,000 cubic meters of permeate a day. The quote states a peak efficiency of 99 percent and a rated pressure of 1,200 psi for the series. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Pump flow outside the pump range. The pump flow of 600 gpm is outside the 264 to 528 gpm of this pump.
  • Stages outside the frame range. 22 stages is outside the 6 to 20 stages of this AquaBold frame.
  • Stated peak efficiency does not match. The quote states a peak efficiency of 99 percent; this series lists 98 percent.

6. A large train with an AquaBold feed pump: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for a seawater reverse osmosis train: 3 PX Q400 pressure exchanger devices with 300 gpm through each device at 1,100 psi, with an AquaBold circulation pump at 400 gpm (frame 3x4x7, 18 stages). The train makes 4,000 cubic meters of permeate a day. The quote states a peak efficiency of 99 percent and a rated pressure of 1,200 psi for the series. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Stated peak efficiency does not match. The quote states a peak efficiency of 99 percent; this series lists 98 percent.

7. A large train with an AquaBold feed pump: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for a seawater reverse osmosis train: 3 PX Q400 pressure exchanger devices with 300 gpm through each device at 1,100 psi, with an AquaBold circulation pump at 400 gpm (frame 3x4x7, 18 stages). The train makes 4,000 cubic meters of permeate a day. The quote states a peak efficiency of 98 percent and a rated pressure of 1,200 psi for the series. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Train summary. Each device handles 290 to 400 gpm up to 1,200 psi at a peak efficiency of 98 percent; the train has 3 devices.

Narration transcript

Click to expand

The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.

  1. Welcome to a demo of Predictika's Validator. An AI sales agent specifies the energy recovery equipment for a reverse osmosis train: the pressure exchanger series and how many devices, the flow through each device, the pressure, and more. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of the figures in the public Energy Recovery 2024 Water Products Catalog and returns a verdict, every reason and the figures it computed.
  2. I will start with the first request by the agent.
  3. The agent says. Please quote the energy recovery equipment for a seawater reverse osmosis train: 3 PX Q400 pressure exchanger devices. The train makes 4,000 cubic meters of permeate a day. The rest of the request is on screen. The quote states a peak efficiency of 99 percent and a rated pressure of 1,200 psi for the series.
  4. Before it goes out, the agent calls the validator.
  5. Blocked, with three findings, all in one answer. The pump flow of 600 gpm is outside the 264 to 528 gpm of this pump. 22 stages is outside the 6 to 20 stages of this AquaBold frame. The quote states a peak efficiency of 99 percent; this series lists 98 percent.
  6. The validator returned three blocking findings in one answer. A check that reads one field at a time would pass most of this; it shows only when the choices in the quote are checked against each other.
  7. What this shows: for flow range that depends on the series, a rules-based CPQ can do this only with workarounds.
  8. Now the agent resubmits.
  9. The corrected request. It changes the pump flow to 400 gpm and the AquaBold stages to 18.
  10. It calls the validator again.
  11. Still blocked, with one finding, all in one answer. The quote states a peak efficiency of 99 percent; this series lists 98 percent.
  12. Two findings cleared. Still blocking: stated peak efficiency does not match.
  13. The agent resubmits once more.
  14. The revised request. It changes the peak efficiency as stated in the quote to 98 percent.
  15. It calls the validator once more.
  16. This time the validator clears it.
  17. The earlier finding is cleared, and the validator's figure matches the quote.
  18. Three problems caught in one call, fixed in two passes, and a clean quote. That is the value of Predictika's validator: catching mistakes before they reach the customer. Now you can try the other scenarios yourself.