Predictika · Upgrade kit and refurbished tool commitments

An AI sales agent's upgrade delivery commitment, checked before it goes out

An AI sales agent prepares a delivery commitment for an installed-base upgrade kit or a refurbished tool: quantity, quarter, lead time, downtime window, deposit, destination and the figures it will state to the customer. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of build capacity, shared spares, crew days, tool generation, export-license and acceptance rules and returns a verdict and every reason.

Scope: Installed-base upgrade kits (etch, deposition, clean) and refurbished tools: supply, shared spares, crew days, tool fit, downtime, lead time, acceptance, deposit and China export-license rules. See everything this validator covers

This validator models upgrade and refurbished-tool delivery commitments, not just the scenarios shown below.

  • Supply and shared resources — kit builds or refurbished cores free in the quarter, long-lead spares shared across all orders, and field installation crew days.
  • Fit and timing — the installed tool generation each kit supports, the downtime window against the installation time, the requested lead time against the standard and minimum, and the acceptance milestone against the quarter the work can be completed.
  • Commercial and compliance — deposit, component cost drift, China export-license status for the gated kits, restricted-party customers, and the availability and lead time the quote states.

Any upgrade or refurbished-tool commitment that touches these rules is in scope — not only the scenarios pictured here. All supply, crew, spares, lead-time and threshold values are invented illustrative demo values, not Lam Research data. Not covered: pricing, tool configuration options, warranty and service terms, and countries other than the allied and China destinations modeled here.

The AI sales agentBuilds the delivery commitment from the conversation and says it is ready.
Predictika validatorChecks every rule at once and returns the verdict, each finding, and the computed figures.

6 scenarios in 3 groups · each group runs from the agent’s first attempt to the outcome · click one to switch

What the agent proposes

The AI sales agent says

Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.

Proposing agent: AI sales agent (scripted)

Before sending, the agent must call Recorded run

Predictika validator


      
Waiting for the call.

Where rules-based CPQ gets it wrong

Click to expand

Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.

What the validator caughtTypical rules-based CPQPredictika
A spares pool shared across ordersOnly with workarounds
The pool is a running balance, so every order has to be netted against it by a separate rule and the rule must be kept in step with the order book.
The pool, the spares per unit and the quantity are in one request and compared on every call.
A quarter that changes several limits at onceOnly with workarounds
Moving an order to a later quarter changes supply, spares, crew days and the earliest acceptance together, and each limit has its own rule that fires at its own step.
The quarter is a field of the request; supply, spares, crew and acceptance are all recalculated and checked together.
A license that applies only to some kitsOnly with care
The China license rule has to be repeated per kit and destination, and a kit added later is easy to miss.
The kit carries a license flag and the destination and license status are checked against it on every call.
Figures the agent states in the quoteOnly with workarounds
Stated availability and lead time are free text or fields outside the rules, so a separate comparison rule is needed for each.
The stated figures are fields of the request and are compared with the supply table and the lead-time table on every call.
Every problem returned in one answerOnly with workarounds
Rules tend to fire as a step is completed, so a rep often fixes one error and meets the next.
All findings come back together, whatever order the choices arrived in.

What this validator catches: findings from its test cases

Click to expand

Every rule is checked on every call, in any order the choices arrive; one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the quote; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.

1This order needs 36 long-lead spares and only 33 are unallocated in Q1 2027; the shared spares pool cannot cover it.
2This order needs 96 field installation crew days and only 90 are open in Q1 2027; the installation cannot be scheduled.
39 units are requested and only 8 can be built or sourced in Q4 2026; the delivery cannot be promised.
4This order leaves under 1 units of margin in Q4 2026; confirm with supply planning.
5This order needs 42 field installation crew days and only 40 are open in Q4 2026; the installation cannot be scheduled.
63 units are requested and only 2 can be built or sourced in Q4 2026; the delivery cannot be promised.
7The quote states 3 units available in Q4 2026, but the supply table shows 2.
8The installed tool is generation 1 and the Deposition upgrade kit for installed VECTOR and ALTUS class tools supports generation 2 or later; the upgrade cannot be quoted for this tool.
9The customer allows 3 weeks of tool downtime and the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools needs at least 4 weeks to install.
1017 weeks is below the 18 week minimum even with expedite for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools.
1118 weeks is below the 26 week standard lead time for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools; expedite needs approval.
1225 weeks is below the 26 week standard lead time for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools; expedite needs approval.
13The acceptance milestone is set for quarter 3 but delivery in Q2 2027 plus installation and acceptance is not complete before quarter 4.
14A deposit of 9 percent is below the 10 percent needed to hold a build or install slot.
15A deposit of 10 percent is below the 30 percent standard; confirm the payment terms with finance.
16A deposit of 29 percent is below the 30 percent standard; confirm the payment terms with finance.
17This shipment to China needs an export license for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools and its status is Not_Filed; do not quote a delivery date.
18This shipment to China needs an export license for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools and its status is Not_Needed; do not quote a delivery date.
19The China export license is pending; the delivery date must be written as contingent on the grant.
20The customer is on a restricted-party list; no quote can be issued.
21The quote states 22 units available in Q2 2027, but the supply table shows 20.
22The quote states a standard lead time of 20 weeks for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools, but it is 26 weeks.
23Component cost has moved 11 percent since the quote; honoring it needs a margin review.
24The acceptance milestone is set for quarter 4 but delivery in Q3 2027 plus installation and acceptance is not complete before quarter 5.

Scenarios and results

Click to expand

The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.

1. Capacity, fit, timing and license: An Etch conversion kit for twelve tools in Q4 2026, shipping to China

The agent's request. Please commit 12 x Etch conversion kit for delivery in Q4 2026, with 12 weeks lead time and 3 weeks of tool downtime allowed; the installed tool is generation 1, the deposit is 5 percent and the acceptance milestone is quarter 1. It ships to China and the export license is not yet filed. I will tell the customer that 10 units are available and the standard lead time is 20 weeks. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Build or refurbished supply short. 12 units are requested and only 8 can be built or sourced in Q4 2026; the delivery cannot be promised.
  • Shared long-lead spares short. This order needs 36 long-lead spares and only 18 are unallocated in Q4 2026; the shared spares pool cannot cover it.
  • Field crew days short. This order needs 96 field installation crew days and only 40 are open in Q4 2026; the installation cannot be scheduled.
  • Tool generation too old. The installed tool is generation 1 and the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools supports generation 2 or later; the upgrade cannot be quoted for this tool.
  • Downtime window too short. The customer allows 3 weeks of tool downtime and the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools needs at least 4 weeks to install.
  • Lead time below the minimum. 12 weeks is below the 18 week minimum even with expedite for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools.
  • Acceptance milestone too early. The acceptance milestone is set for quarter 1 but delivery in Q4 2026 plus installation and acceptance is not complete before quarter 2.
  • Deposit too low to hold a slot. A deposit of 5 percent is below the 10 percent needed to hold a build or install slot.
  • China export license missing. This shipment to China needs an export license for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools and its status is Not_Filed; do not quote a delivery date.
  • Stated availability does not match. The quote states 10 units available in Q4 2026, but the supply table shows 8.
  • Stated lead time does not match. The quote states a standard lead time of 20 weeks for the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools, but it is 26 weeks.

2. Capacity, fit, timing and license: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please commit 12 x Etch conversion kit for delivery in Q2 2027, with 26 weeks lead time and 4 weeks of tool downtime allowed; the installed tool is generation 3, the deposit is 30 percent and the acceptance milestone is quarter 4. It ships to China and the export license is granted. I will tell the customer that 20 units are available and the standard lead time is 26 weeks. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Commitment summary. Q2 2027 has 20 kit builds, 5 refurbished cores, 60 unallocated long-lead spares and 140 open crew days; the Etch conversion kit for installed conductor and dielectric etch tools needs 36 spares and 96 crew days for this order, takes 4 weeks to install, has a 26 week standard and 18 week minimum lead time, needs tool generation 2 or later, and earliest acceptance is quarter 4.

3. Approvals: A Deposition kit for nineteen tools shipping to China with a pending license

The agent's request. Please commit 19 x Deposition upgrade kit for delivery in Q2 2027, with 20 weeks lead time and 3 weeks of tool downtime allowed; the installed tool is generation 2, the deposit is 20 percent and the acceptance milestone is quarter 4. It ships to China and the export license is pending. Component cost has moved 15 percent. I will tell the customer that 20 units are available and the standard lead time is 24 weeks. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Needs approval.

  • Expedite needs approval. 20 weeks is below the 24 week standard lead time for the Deposition upgrade kit for installed VECTOR and ALTUS class tools; expedite needs approval.
  • Cost drift needs margin review. Component cost has moved 15 percent since the quote; honoring it needs a margin review.
  • Deposit below the standard. A deposit of 20 percent is below the 30 percent standard; confirm the payment terms with finance.
  • Thin supply margin. This order leaves under 2 units of margin in Q2 2027; confirm with supply planning.
  • China license pending. The China export license is pending; the delivery date must be written as contingent on the grant.
  • Commitment summary. Q2 2027 has 20 kit builds, 5 refurbished cores, 60 unallocated long-lead spares and 140 open crew days; the Deposition upgrade kit for installed VECTOR and ALTUS class tools needs 38 spares and 114 crew days for this order, takes 3 weeks to install, has a 24 week standard and 16 week minimum lead time, needs tool generation 2 or later, and earliest acceptance is quarter 4.

4. Approvals: The agent resubmits after the approvals are addressed

The agent's request. Please commit 15 x Deposition upgrade kit for delivery in Q2 2027, with 24 weeks lead time and 3 weeks of tool downtime allowed; the installed tool is generation 2, the deposit is 30 percent and the acceptance milestone is quarter 4. It ships to China and the export license is granted. Component cost has moved 5 percent. I will tell the customer that 20 units are available and the standard lead time is 24 weeks. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Commitment summary. Q2 2027 has 20 kit builds, 5 refurbished cores, 60 unallocated long-lead spares and 140 open crew days; the Deposition upgrade kit for installed VECTOR and ALTUS class tools needs 30 spares and 90 crew days for this order, takes 3 weeks to install, has a 24 week standard and 16 week minimum lead time, needs tool generation 2 or later, and earliest acceptance is quarter 4.

5. Refurbished tools: Three refurbished Reliant-class tools in Q4 2026

The agent's request. Please commit 3 x Refurbished Reliant-class tool for delivery in Q4 2026, with 20 weeks lead time and 3 weeks of tool downtime allowed; the installed tool is generation 3, the deposit is 50 percent and the acceptance milestone is quarter 2. I will tell the customer that 3 units are available and the standard lead time is 30 weeks. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Build or refurbished supply short. 3 units are requested and only 2 can be built or sourced in Q4 2026; the delivery cannot be promised.
  • Downtime window too short. The customer allows 3 weeks of tool downtime and the Refurbished Reliant-class tool needs at least 5 weeks to install.
  • Lead time below the minimum. 20 weeks is below the 28 week minimum even with expedite for the Refurbished Reliant-class tool.
  • Acceptance milestone too early. The acceptance milestone is set for quarter 2 but delivery in Q4 2026 plus installation and acceptance is not complete before quarter 3.
  • Stated availability does not match. The quote states 3 units available in Q4 2026, but the supply table shows 2.
  • Stated lead time does not match. The quote states a standard lead time of 30 weeks for the Refurbished Reliant-class tool, but it is 36 weeks.

6. Refurbished tools: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please commit 2 x Refurbished Reliant-class tool for delivery in Q2 2027, with 36 weeks lead time and 5 weeks of tool downtime allowed; the installed tool is generation 3, the deposit is 50 percent and the acceptance milestone is quarter 5. I will tell the customer that 5 units are available and the standard lead time is 36 weeks. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Commitment summary. Q2 2027 has 20 kit builds, 5 refurbished cores, 60 unallocated long-lead spares and 140 open crew days; the Refurbished Reliant-class tool needs 8 spares and 20 crew days for this order, takes 5 weeks to install, has a 36 week standard and 28 week minimum lead time, needs tool generation 1 or later, and earliest acceptance is quarter 5.

Narration transcript

Click to expand

The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.

  1. Welcome to a demo of Predictika's Validator. An AI sales agent prepares a delivery commitment for an installed-base upgrade kit or a refurbished tool: quantity, quarter, lead time, and more. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of build capacity, shared spares, crew days, tool generation, export-license and acceptance rules and returns a verdict and every reason.
  2. I will start with the first request by the agent.
  3. The agent says. Please commit 12 x Etch conversion kit for delivery in Q4 2026, with 12 weeks lead time and 3 weeks of tool downtime allowed; the installed tool is generation 1. It ships to China and the export license is not yet filed. The rest of the request is on screen.
  4. Before it goes out, the agent calls the validator.
  5. Blocked, with eleven findings, all in one answer. 12 units are requested and only 8 can be built or sourced in Q4 2026; the delivery cannot be promised. This order needs 36 long-lead spares and only 18 are unallocated in Q4 2026; the shared spares pool cannot cover it. This order needs 96 field installation crew days and only 40 are open in Q4 2026; the installation cannot be scheduled. The other eight are on screen.
  6. The validator returned eleven blocking findings in one answer. A check that reads one field at a time would pass most of this; it shows only when the choices in the quote are checked against each other.
  7. What this shows: for a spares pool shared across orders, a rules-based CPQ can do this only with workarounds.
  8. Now the agent resubmits.
  9. The corrected request. It changes the delivery quarter to Q2 2027, the requested lead time to 26 weeks, the downtime allowed to 4 weeks, the installed tool generation to 3, the stated availability to 20 units and the stated standard lead time to 26 weeks. Three more changes are on screen.
  10. It calls the validator again.
  11. This time the validator clears it.
  12. All eleven earlier findings are cleared.
  13. Eleven problems caught in one call, fixed in one pass, and a clean quote. That is the value of Predictika's validator: catching mistakes before they reach the customer.