Predictika · Electricity connection offers

An AI sales agent's connection offer, checked before it goes out

An AI sales agent prepares a connection offer for a customer who wants a new demand or generation connection to the distribution network: the capacity, the voltage, the reinforcement the network needs, a flexible connection scheme, the offer type and how long it is open. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of the National Grid Electricity Distribution connection charging methodology and returns a verdict, every reason and the connection charge it computed.

Scope: Demand and generation connection offers from National Grid Electricity Distribution: assessment and design charge, one-voltage rule, cost apportionment, flexible connections, temporary connections and offer validity. See everything this validator covers

This validator models National Grid Electricity Distribution connection offers, not just the scenarios shown below.

  • Category and capacity — the connection category against the voltage and capacity, the standard charging bands, the published assessment and design charge, and approvals for large low-voltage demand and for domestic connections above 15 kW.
  • Reinforcement and apportionment — the one-voltage rule that decides which network assets a connection at a given voltage can be charged for, the cost apportionment factor (capacity or fault level), the 200 pounds per kW high-cost threshold for generation, and temporary connections of up to five years.
  • Flexible connections, validity and total — Type 1A, 1B and 2 cost allocation (Type 1B needs two or more participants), offers open for 90 days or 30 days for interactive offers, conditional interactive offers, and the connection charge the offer states against the charge computed.

Any National Grid Electricity Distribution connection offer that touches these rules is in scope — not only the scenarios pictured here. Not covered: other distribution network operators, transmission connections, use of system charges and taxes. The assessment and design charges follow the published statement; the extension, reinforcement and equipment costs are scheme estimates entered with the request (see the note at the foot of the page).

The AI sales agentBuilds the connection offer from the conversation and says it is ready.
Predictika validatorChecks every rule at once and returns the verdict, each finding, and the computed figures.

6 scenarios in 3 groups · each group runs from the agent’s first attempt to the outcome · click one to switch

What the agent proposes

The AI sales agent says

Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.

Proposing agent: AI sales agent (scripted)

Before sending, the agent must call Recorded run

Predictika validator


      
Waiting for the call.

Where rules-based CPQ gets it wrong

Click to expand

Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.

What the validator caughtTypical rules-based CPQPredictika
A reinforcement charge that depends on the voltage of the connectionOnly with care
The one-voltage rule is a table of asset by connection voltage, so each cell needs a rule and the table has to be kept in step with the methodology.
The asset and the connection voltage are fields of one request and are checked against the rule on every call.
An apportioned share with a divisorOnly with workarounds
The customer share is the cost times the required capacity over the new capacity, capped at 100 percent, so a rule is needed to compute it and to stop a zero divisor.
The share is computed on every call, and a missing capacity is reported as a finding instead of an error.
Offer validity that depends on the offer typeOnly with care
Interactive offers are open for 30 days and other offers for 90, so the days since the offer and the days it is open must be compared per type.
The offer type, its validity and its age are checked together on every call.
A stated charge that must match the computed chargeOnly with workarounds
The charge is built from several lines, so a separate rule is needed to recompute it and compare it with the stated figure.
The stated charge is a field of the request and is compared with the computed total on every call.
Every problem returned in one answerOnly with workarounds
Rules tend to fire as the offer is saved or a step is completed, so a planner often fixes one error and meets the next.
All findings come back together, whatever order the choices arrived in.

What this validator catches: findings from its test cases

Click to expand

Every rule is checked on every call, in any order the choices arrive; one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the offer; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.

1The chosen connection category does not fit the connection: single-service and small-project demand categories are LV demand up to 69 kVA, and a small scale embedded generator is LV generation up to 16 A per phase (11 kVA).
2Demand above 1,000 kVA at low voltage is not normally supplied at LV and has no published Assessment and Design band; a planner should confirm the voltage of connection and the charge.
3A required capacity of 10,001 kVA is outside the standard charging bands for this voltage (at least 1 kVA, and demand at HV up to 10,000 kVA).
4A required capacity of 0 kVA is outside the standard charging bands for this voltage (at least 1 kVA, and demand at HV up to 10,000 kVA).
5Reinforcement for this generation connection exceeds the 200 pounds per kW high-cost threshold; the excess of 200,000 pounds is charged in full and should be confirmed with the applicant.
6Reinforcement of this kind of network asset does not arise for a connection at this point-of-connection voltage under the one-voltage rule.
7The apportionment needs a new network capacity or new fault level capacity above zero; 0 was given.
8A temporary connection is one needed for up to five years; 6 years was given.
9A Type 1B multi-customer flexible scheme needs at least 2 participants; 1 was given.
10An interactive connection offer is open for 30 days at most; the offer states 31 days.
11This is a conditional interactive offer and depends on other offers in the queue not being accepted; a person should confirm the queue position.
12The offer was issued 91 days ago and was open for 90 days, so it has expired.
13A domestic connection is normally sized for 15 kW; 16 kVA needs to be agreed with the applicant.
14The offer states a connection charge of 70,018 pounds; the inputs give 70,019 pounds.
15The offer states a connection charge of 71,019 pounds; the inputs give 70,019 pounds.
16The offer was issued 120 days ago and was open for 90 days, so it has expired.
17The offer states a connection charge of 1 pounds; the inputs give 166,019 pounds.
18An interactive connection offer is open for 30 days at most; the offer states 60 days.
19The offer states a connection charge of 100,000 pounds; the inputs give 107,707 pounds.
20The offer was issued 95 days ago and was open for 90 days, so it has expired.
21Reinforcement for this generation connection exceeds the 200 pounds per kW high-cost threshold; the excess of 300,000 pounds is charged in full and should be confirmed with the applicant.

Scenarios and results

Click to expand

The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.

1. Flexible scheme, offer validity and charge: A 2,000 kVA high-voltage generation offer with a Type 1B flexible connection, a 60-day interactive offer and a stated charge of 100,000 pounds

The agent's request. Please issue a standard generation connection offer for 2,000 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection, with HV network reinforcement estimated at 300,000 pounds adding 0 kVA of network capacity, and the extension at 45,000 pounds, a Type 1B flexible connection with 1 participant, as an unconditional interactive offer open for 60 days, accepted 95 days after it was issued, for a connection charge of 100,000 pounds. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Capacity or fault level denominator missing. The apportionment needs a new network capacity or new fault level capacity above zero; 0 was given.
  • Type 1B needs a second participant. A Type 1B multi-customer flexible scheme needs at least 2 participants; 1 was given.
  • Interactive offer open longer than 30 days. An interactive connection offer is open for 30 days at most; the offer states 60 days.
  • Offer has expired. The offer was issued 95 days ago and was open for 60 days, so it has expired.
  • Stated total does not match. The offer states a connection charge of 100,000 pounds; the inputs give 374,707 pounds.

2. Flexible scheme, offer validity and charge: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please issue a standard generation connection offer for 2,000 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection, with HV network reinforcement estimated at 300,000 pounds adding 10,000 kVA of network capacity, and the extension at 45,000 pounds, a Type 1B flexible connection with 2 participants, as an unconditional interactive offer open for 30 days, accepted 25 days after it was issued, for a connection charge of 122,707 pounds. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Charge summary. Assessment and design 2,707 pounds, customer share of reinforcement 60,000 pounds, flexible connection equipment 15,000 pounds, total connection charge 122,707 pounds.

3. Category and reinforcement asset: A single-service demand offer for 70 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection with HV/LV substation reinforcement

The agent's request. Please issue a single-service demand connection offer for 70 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection, with HV/LV substation reinforcement estimated at 120,000 pounds adding 4,000 kVA of network capacity, and the extension at 45,000 pounds, open for 90 days, accepted 10 days after it was issued, for a connection charge of 45,133 pounds. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Blocked.

  • Connection category does not fit. The chosen connection category does not fit the connection: single-service and small-project demand categories are LV demand up to 69 kVA, and a small scale embedded generator is LV generation up to 16 A per phase (11 kVA).
  • Reinforcement not applicable at this voltage. Reinforcement of this kind of network asset does not arise for a connection at this point-of-connection voltage under the one-voltage rule.

4. Category and reinforcement asset: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please issue a standard demand connection offer for 800 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection, with HV network reinforcement estimated at 120,000 pounds adding 4,000 kVA of network capacity, and the extension at 45,000 pounds, open for 90 days, accepted 10 days after it was issued, for a connection charge of 70,019 pounds. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Charge summary. Assessment and design 1,019 pounds, customer share of reinforcement 24,000 pounds, flexible connection equipment 0 pounds, total connection charge 70,019 pounds.

5. High-cost generation and conditional offer: A 2,000 kVA generation offer with 700,000 pounds of reinforcement as a conditional interactive offer

The agent's request. Please issue a standard generation connection offer for 2,000 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection, with HV network reinforcement estimated at 700,000 pounds adding 10,000 kVA of network capacity, and the extension at 45,000 pounds, as a conditional interactive offer open for 30 days, accepted 10 days after it was issued, for a connection charge of 427,707 pounds. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Needs approval.

  • Generation reinforcement above 200 pounds per kW. Reinforcement for this generation connection exceeds the 200 pounds per kW high-cost threshold; the excess of 300,000 pounds is charged in full and should be confirmed with the applicant.
  • Conditional interactive offer. This is a conditional interactive offer and depends on other offers in the queue not being accepted; a person should confirm the queue position.
  • Charge summary. Assessment and design 2,707 pounds, customer share of reinforcement 380,000 pounds, flexible connection equipment 0 pounds, total connection charge 427,707 pounds.

6. High-cost generation and conditional offer: The agent resubmits after fixing the errors

The agent's request. Please issue a standard generation connection offer for 2,000 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection, with HV network reinforcement estimated at 350,000 pounds adding 10,000 kVA of network capacity, and the extension at 45,000 pounds, as an unconditional interactive offer open for 30 days, accepted 10 days after it was issued, for a connection charge of 117,707 pounds. It is ready to send.

Verdict: Allowed.

  • Charge summary. Assessment and design 2,707 pounds, customer share of reinforcement 70,000 pounds, flexible connection equipment 0 pounds, total connection charge 117,707 pounds.

Narration transcript

Click to expand

The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.

  1. Welcome to a demo of Predictika's Validator. An AI sales agent prepares a connection offer for a customer who wants a new demand or generation connection to the distribution network: the capacity, the voltage, the reinforcement the network needs, and more. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of the National Grid Electricity Distribution connection charging methodology and returns a verdict, every reason and the connection charge it computed.
  2. I will start with the first request by the agent.
  3. The agent says. Please issue a standard generation connection offer for 2,000 kVA at the high-voltage point of connection, with HV network reinforcement estimated at 300,000 pounds adding 0 kVA of network capacity. It is ready to send. The rest of the request is on screen.
  4. Before it goes out, the agent calls the validator.
  5. Blocked, with five findings, all in one answer. The apportionment needs a new network capacity or new fault level capacity above zero; 0 was given. A Type 1B multi-customer flexible scheme needs at least 2 participants; 1 was given. An interactive connection offer is open for 30 days at most; the offer states 60 days. The other two are on screen.
  6. The validator returned five blocking findings in one answer. A check that reads one field at a time would pass most of this; it shows only when the choices in the offer are checked against each other.
  7. What this shows: for offer validity that depends on the offer type, a rules-based CPQ is error-prone for this.
  8. Now the agent resubmits.
  9. The corrected request. It changes the new network capacity to 10,000 kVA, the flexible participants to 2, the offer open for to 30 days, the days since the offer was issued to 25 and the connection charge stated on the offer to 122,707 pounds.
  10. It calls the validator again.
  11. This time the validator clears it.
  12. All five earlier findings are cleared.
  13. Five problems caught in one call, fixed in one pass, and a clean offer. That is the value of Predictika's validator: catching mistakes before the offer goes out. Now you can try the other scenarios yourself.