Predictika · NetApp ONTAP storage and Keystone subscriptions
An AI sales agent prepares a NetApp ONTAP storage quote, bought outright or as a Keystone storage-as-a-service subscription: array model, drives, HA pairs, licensing, discount, and the capacity and price it states. Before it goes out, the agent sends it to Predictika, which checks it against a declarative model of the configuration and subscription rules and returns a verdict, every reason, the figures it computed and, for a quote that can proceed, the line-item quote itself.
Source and independence. The rules in this validator come from NetApp's public documents. NetApp is not involved in this demonstration and has not endorsed it. Every price is an illustrative estimate, because NetApp does not publish prices; they are not NetApp prices.
This validator handles any quote for these NetApp ONTAP systems or Keystone subscriptions — not just the scenarios shown below.
Illustrative, not NetApp's: all prices (drives, chassis and shelves, the ONTAP license and support percentages of hardware list, MetroCluster switches), the Keystone rate per TiB-month, the discount authority (10 percent for a rep, 30 or 40 percent with approval), the per-model limits on drives and raw capacity, the drive sizes allowed per model, the ASA r2 layout and mixing rules, the share of ineligible data above which the efficiency guarantee needs approval, the support level required on MetroCluster deals, and the use of one 25 TiB capacity step and one minimum commitment per Keystone service level. From NetApp's public pages: the system names, the license suites ONTAP One, ONTAP One for SAN and ONTAP Base, and the efficiency guarantee ratios (4 to 1 for SAN, 1.5 to 1 for NAS, 3 to 1 for NAS on VMware, Hyper-V or KVM). Could not be confirmed publicly: SupportEdge response times, and whether ONTAP Base may be sold with MetroCluster.
Not covered: NetApp StorageGRID, E-Series, Cloud Volumes and BlueXP services, real NetApp prices, and NetApp's own CPQ rules. NetApp's Keystone pages state each minimum per performance service level instance (PSLI) and do not tie a PSLI to a number of HA pairs, so this validator checks the committed capacity of the whole quote against one minimum; that is an assumption, not a NetApp rule. Nothing here replaces NetApp's current terms or a NetApp quote.
9 scenarios in 4 groups · each group runs from the agent’s first attempt to the outcome · click one to switch
Illustrative agent statement. The validator receives the structured request below.
Proposing agent: AI sales agent (scripted)
Before sending, the agent must call Recorded run
What this means
Our assessment of what a typical rules-based CPQ (product rules, price rules and validation rules, as in Salesforce CPQ) does with the same cases. It is a judgment about effort and reliability, not a claim that nothing can be built.
| What the validator caught | Typical rules-based CPQ | Predictika |
|---|---|---|
| A Keystone service level that does not fit the system family, with a second error in the same quote | Only with care A product rule per level and family. It works, but it fires when the level is picked, so the next error, such as the capacity step, shows up only after the first is fixed. | The level, the minimum and the capacity step are checked together on every call and returned in one answer. |
| Keystone minimum commitment that differs by service level | Only with care A lookup per level. Reliable only if the committed capacity is always a field on the quote and the minimums are kept in step when levels change. | One table of minimums; the check follows from the level chosen, in any order. |
| A Keystone subscription priced as one line, with no hardware, license or support lines | Only with workarounds Hardware, license and support lines have to be suppressed and a TiB-month line built from capacity, rate and term, with price rules that behave differently from a purchase. | The subscription line comes from the same model that checked the quote, and reconciles to the total. |
| Effective capacity delivered vs the capacity the quote states | Only with workarounds Needs usable capacity from drive size, RAID parity, spares, RAID groups and file-system overhead, then an efficiency ratio, and a stated figure that is rarely a field on the quote. | Computed from the model; the stated capacity and price travel with the quote and are compared with the computed ones on every call. |
| Discount above a rep's limit, approvable up to a limit that depends on deal size | Only with care A validation rule plus an approval rule keyed to deal size. Works, but the limits end up copied into several rules. | Block and approval are separate outcomes of the same check; the limit comes from the deal size. |
| Every problem returned in one answer | Only with workarounds Rules tend to fire as the quote is saved or a step is completed, so a rep often fixes one error and meets the next. | All findings come back together, whatever order the choices arrived in. |
Every rule is checked on every call, in any order the choices arrive; one problem never hides another. Blocking findings stop the quote; approval findings need a person to sign off; everything else is computed.
| 1 | The Keystone Extreme performance service level is not offered on AFF C80; Extreme and Premium are offered on AFF A-Series and ASA A-Series, Standard on AFF C-Series and ASA C-Series, and Value on FAS. |
| 2 | Keystone Extreme capacity must be committed in 25 TiB increments; 60 TiB is not. |
| 3 | The committed capacity of 60 TiB is below the 100 TiB minimum for the Keystone Standard performance service level. |
| 4 | The quote states 2,300.00 TiB of effective capacity; the configuration gives 2,115.84 TiB. |
| 5 | The requested discount of 35 percent exceeds the 30 percent authority for a deal of $152,508.00. |
| 6 | A 20 percent discount is above the 10 percent a sales rep can give; it can be approved up to 30 percent for this deal. |
| 7 | 60 percent of the data is encrypted, already compressed or otherwise ineligible for the efficiency guarantee; sales management must approve the guarantee. |
| 8 | AFF A50 needs ONTAP 9.16.1.0 or later; the quote specifies ONTAP 9.15.1.0. |
| 9 | ASA A50 is an ASA r2 system and supports SAN protocols only; NFS, SMB and S3 are not available on it. |
| 10 | ASA r2 systems do not support MetroCluster, so ASA A70 cannot be quoted with it. |
| 11 | 60 drives per HA pair exceed the 48 drive maximum for AFF A20. |
| 12 | The configuration gives 249.80 TiB of effective capacity; 300 TiB is required. |
| 13 | The quote states 300.00 TiB of effective capacity; the configuration gives 249.80 TiB. |
| 14 | The Storage Efficiency Guarantee for this workload is 4 to 1; the quote promises 5 to 1. |
| 15 | MetroCluster IP on AFF C250 needs ONTAP 9.12.1.0 or later; the quote specifies ONTAP 9.10.1.0. |
The recorded result of the validator for each scenario on this page: the request the AI agent sent, the verdict, and every finding, in the order they appear above.
The agent's request. Please quote a Keystone Extreme subscription of 60 TiB committed on an AFF C80 with one HA pair and 48 NVMe drives of 61.2 TB per pair, for SAN, with a 35 percent discount. The customer needs 1,000 TiB effective. The quote states 9,500 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $73,008.00. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please quote a Keystone Standard subscription of 60 TiB committed on an AFF C80 with one HA pair and 48 NVMe drives of 61.2 TB per pair, for SAN, with a 20 percent discount. The customer needs 1,000 TiB effective. The quote states 8,676.52 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $73,008.00. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please quote a Keystone Standard subscription of 200 TiB committed on an AFF C80 with one HA pair and 48 NVMe drives of 61.2 TB per pair, for SAN, with a 10 percent discount. The customer needs 1,000 TiB effective. The quote states 8,676.52 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $155,520.00. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Please quote a Keystone Standard subscription of 60 TiB committed on an AFF C60 with one HA pair and 24 NVMe drives of 30.6 TB per pair, for NAS. The customer needs 500 TiB effective. The quote states 754.03 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $51,840.00. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please quote a Keystone Standard subscription of 120 TiB committed on an AFF C60 with one HA pair and 24 NVMe drives of 30.6 TB per pair, for NAS. The customer needs 500 TiB effective. The quote states 754.03 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $103,680.00. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Please quote an AFF A70 with one HA pair and 48 NVMe drives of 15.3 TB per pair, for SAN, with a 4 to 1 efficiency guarantee and a 5 percent discount. The customer needs 2,000 TiB effective. The quote states 2,300 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $425,474.60. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please quote an AFF A70 with one HA pair and 48 NVMe drives of 15.3 TB per pair, for SAN, with a 4 to 1 efficiency guarantee and a 5 percent discount. The customer needs 2,000 TiB effective. The quote states 2,115.84 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $425,474.60. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Allowed.
The agent's request. Please quote an AFF A50 with one HA pair and 24 NVMe drives of 7.6 TB per pair, for SAN, with a 35 percent discount. The customer needs 300 TiB effective. The quote states 374.73 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $99,130.20. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Blocked.
The agent's request. Please quote an AFF A50 with one HA pair and 24 NVMe drives of 7.6 TB per pair, for SAN, with a 20 percent discount. The customer needs 300 TiB effective. The quote states 374.73 TiB effective capacity and a net price of $122,006.40. It is ready to send.
Verdict: Needs approval.
The text of the narrated walkthrough, step by step.