Predictika
Agentic Action Validation

Let your AI agents act. Check every action first.

An AI agent proposes a refund, a deploy, a quote or a journal entry. Predictika checks it against your actual rules and returns allow, needs approval or block, with the reason, before anything executes.

Built on a patented deterministic engine. More than 1,700 validators built and tested against it. A first validator for a new domain in under 2 days.

agent → predictika-validateMeridian Controls (fictional)
Request from the agent
agent
support-agent-07
tool
issue_refund
order
MC-20417
amount
$180.00
reason
Damaged on arrival
Validator step log
  1. 1Order MC-20417 found, delivered 12 days ago, inside the 30-day window
  2. 2Amount is under the $250 support-agent limit
  3. 3Team refund budget: $1,420 of $5,000 used this month (live counter)
  4. 4No rule fired
AllowRefund can proceed
Agent aloneWould execute
With PredictikaAllowed, all checks passed
Raw response
{
  "valid": true,
  "llm_messages": [],
  "audit_messages": ["Refund within limits"],
  "user_messages": []
}
Simulated run. The rules behind it were tested on the live engine. Meridian Controls is a fictional company.
How it works

The agent proposes. The validator decides.

Your agent keeps its own model and tools. Before it runs anything that matters, it asks the validator, and the validator answers from your rules, not from a language model's guess.

The agent proposes

Any agent, any framework, calls the validator through MCP or an endpoint with the action it wants to take and the choices behind it.

The validator checks

Your policies, catalogs and price lists are loaded as constraints. The engine reasons over all of them together, in any order the choices arrive.

A verdict, with reasons

Separate messages go to the agent, the audit log and the user. A hard failure rejects the action.

AllowNeeds approvalBlock
Where it applies

Four places a wrong answer costs money

A validator earns its place where several interdependent choices must hold together, a wrong answer is expensive, and someone will ask why.

Agent actions

Agent Action Validator

Refunds, production deploys, access changes, network commands, email. Same action, different verdict, depending on who asks, what came before and what is left in the budget.

See how it works
CPQ to cash

CPQ-to-Cash Validator

Product configuration, pricing, bill of materials and delivery commitments, with stacked discounts, renewals and approvals. For teams whose quoting rules are hard to model, slow to change, tough to explain or difficult to trust.

See how it works
Finance operations

Finance Operations Validator

Procure to pay, journal entries, tax positions, segregation of duties, sustainability materiality. Rules an auditor can read, with a reason attached to every finding.

See how it works
Financial services

Financial Services Validator

Sanctions, AML and KYC checks, loans, insurance claims, and trading or digital-asset orders. Every decision gets a verdict and the rule behind it.

See how it works
Track record

What stands behind the validators

1,700+validators built and tested on the live engine
< 2 daysto a first tested validator for a new domain
Hoursto change a running model (one audit model took six rounds in under twelve hours)
10+patents across Predictika, Selectica and machine learning work, including two on validating LLM-driven systems
From the library

Validators from today's rotation

More than 1,700 validators and the list keeps growing. Each one checks a quote, order or decision against rules modeled from the product's public information, and plays back a run recorded on the live engine. A new set appears every day.

Cloud and data platforms

Google Cloud quote

Google Cloud compute quote-time pricing check for VM fleets and commitments.

  • Resource-based committed-use discounts on vCPU only (1 and 3 year by…
  • Flex CUD spend commitments with sizing advice
  • Shared and family volume tiers
  • Range versus slab discount schedules
Play the demo
Industrial equipment and automation

Woodward

Configuration check for Woodward MicroNet Plus turbine control systems.

  • Full chassis with 14 VME slots or narrow with 8
  • Four reserved for power supplies
  • CPU taking one or two slots when redundant
  • CPU5200 and CPUP1020 versus earlier-revision Cyber Secure CPU (goes…
Play the demo
Data center cooling

Munters Group - Data Center Cooling Order

Data center cooling unit order validation (sizing and siting).

  • Oasis Standard load and airflow vs model rating
  • Footprint
  • Height and weight by mounting vs site limits
  • Stated totals
Play the demo

These are independent demonstrations. Each validator was built from publicly available information, with fictional customers and example prices. Predictika does not claim these companies as customers, and they have not reviewed or endorsed these examples.

Try it

See a validator for your domain before we talk

Tell us the agent action you worry about most. We build a first validator from your public catalog, policies or price list and send you a private link in under 2 days. Point your own agent at it and see what it catches.

For developers

Add it to your agent in one command

uv tool install pdtk-val-mcp

Early access. Runs as an MCP server named predictika-validator-mcp. Developer quickstart